The Human Cost of Unethical Storytelling in Medical & Health Innovation

Levi Cheptora

Sun, 19 Oct 2025

I. Framing the Crisis: Narrative Harm as a Systemic Public Health and Economic Failure

1.1. The Anatomy of Deficit-Based Storytelling: From "Poverty Porn" to Systemic Reductionism

Unethical storytelling in global health contexts, particularly concerning Africa, represents a critical barrier to achieving health equity and economic stability. This challenge is rooted in the persistent use of deficit-based narratives that prioritize emotional impact over the dignity and agency of the communities they claim to serve. The term "Poverty Porn," coined in 1985, describes the widely criticized, yet still frequently employed, practice of using sensationalized, exploitative imagery and narratives—such as the archetypal "sad kid" or scenes of misery and diarrhea—to solicit donations.1

While leading humanitarian organizations acknowledge this critique and have made internal strides toward adopting ethical communications guidelines 1, the visible shift in external fundraising communications has remained minimal.1 This disconnect indicates that while organizations may be growing internally aware of the moral hazards, the foundational economic incentives driving fundraising often override stated ethical principles.

A central violation of ethical communication is reductionism and voice erasure. Unethical storytelling systematically ignores local variables, complexity, and inherent resilience, reducing diverse communities and nations to singular, dehumanizing labels such as "poverty," "victim," or a state of perpetual "need" (User Query). This harmful practice overlooks the expectations of recipient communities and perpetuates "poisonous perceptions" built up over centuries, undermining Africa's ability to address challenges on its own terms.3 When an individual's voice is edited out, or an entire community's complexity is ignored, the resulting narrative fails to reflect the necessary context that defines a two-way relationship between Africa and the world.3

The persistence of these harmful practices is often sustained by perverse funding mechanisms. Organizations operating under significant resource pressure frequently rationalize that utilizing high-impact, emotionally charged narratives—even those deemed exploitative—is the "better alternative to raise more donations," adhering to the controversial belief that the "end justifies the means".4 This institutional optimization for emotional utility means that organizations financially dependent on external goodwill are incentivized to feature the most dramatic depictions of suffering.2 Such a market demand institutionalizes the preference for reductionist narratives, making nuanced, complex, and agency-driven health journalism economically uncompetitive against low-road fundraising tactics that secure immediate donor interest.

The highly fragmented nature of global health financing, with numerous parallel funding streams often focusing narrowly on single diseases instead of strengthening broad, resilient health systems, exacerbates this problem.5 This fragmentation fosters fierce competition for attention and resources, inherently rewarding the immediate, visceral response generated by acute crisis narratives, thereby reinforcing the cycle of exploitation and sensationalism.5

1.2. The Ethical Divide: Western Liberalism vs. African Communalism in Bioethics

The failure of global health communication ethics is often compounded by the limitations of applying Western liberal bioethical frameworks—which prioritize individual autonomy—to communal healthcare settings in Africa. Western bioethics is typically grounded in either utilitarianism (maximizing aggregate welfare) or Kantianism (respect for individual autonomy and non-consequentialist reasons).7 While critical, these frameworks often prove insufficient for capturing the complex relational dynamics inherent in African healthcare contexts.

The African moral theory, often grounded in the concept of Ubuntu, offers a powerful alternative centered on community and relationality. Ubuntu is characterized by the maxim, "A person is a person through other persons" or "I am because we are".8 In this theory, personhood is not inherent but moralized and achieved through positively relating to others in a communal manner, defined by two forms of interaction: Identity (coordinating behavior for shared ends, thinking of oneself as part of a collective "we") and Solidarity (mutual aid and emotional investment in one another's flourishing).8 An action is considered right insofar as it promotes or prizes these communal relationships.8

This African moral theory fundamentally redefines the rationale for free and informed consent. While Kantianism defends consent as respecting individual autonomy and Utilitarianism defends it based on its welfarist consequences (e.g., maintaining trust and adherence) 8, the Ubuntu framework asserts that consent is expected because to treat or study a person without their knowledge and willing participation would be considered "unfriendly." Genuine communal identity requires transparency about the basic terms of interaction and willingness from all parties to achieve goals together.8

Furthermore, the African moral theory provides a distinct lens on balancing individual risk with social benefit. While utilitarianism weighs individual harm against maximum aggregate utility, and Kantianism places strong restrictions on using an individual merely as a means, Ubuntu insists that ethical conduct must respect extant communal relationships.8 This principle implies that ethical storytelling must not only secure individual permission but also ensure that the published narrative promotes the dignity, self-perception, and communal identity of the represented group. Adopting an Ubuntu-centric framework for communication requires transforming the subject from a passive research or aid recipient (a "means") into an active, respected partner in a joint communal project (a "we").9 This relational transformation demands that external content creators prioritize local dignity over their foreign fundraising utility.

Table 1: Comparison of Ethical Principles on Consent and Dignity in Global Health Storytelling

1.3. The Political Economy of Suffering: Donor Pressures and Fragmentation

The reliance on deficit-based storytelling is structurally reinforced by the dynamics of global health financing. The system is inherently skewed toward funding acute crises rather than sustained, systemic development. As donor nations face post-COVID austerity and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) grapple with debt crises and compounding disasters—such as climate shocks and conflicts displacing millions—the structural pressure to secure critical funding intensifies.6

Global health financing remains heavily fragmented, channeling resources through "many parallel funding streams that continue to focus on single diseases, rather than creating the most effective system".5 This structural defect inherently encourages organizations to prioritize sensationalist appeals focused on single-issue crises, rather than complex, long-term documentation of systemic improvement.

Furthermore, accountability mechanisms often fail to correct this behavior. Existing literature on NGO-donor relationships demonstrates that while reporting requirements demand significant NGO resources, the information gathered is often rarely used by the NGO for internal decision-making or by the donor for future funding allocations.10 This suggests that reporting frequently functions as a bureaucratic exercise to fulfill compliance, rather than a mechanism for generating useful program insights.11 When reporting is primarily focused on compliance and anecdotal emotional impact (to secure continued funding), the system inherently rewards the dramatization of need and deficit over the documentation of agency and structural impact. This institutional failure in donor accountability extends beyond mere financial metrics into profound ethical shortcomings. If NGOs believe the "end justifies the means" to maximize donations 4, the fragmented, compliance-driven funding environment inadvertently rewards trauma narratives.

II. The Immediate and Long-Term Human Cost (The Invisible Wound)

2.1. Psychological Re-traumatization and the Violation of Dignity

The most immediate and intimate cost of unethical storytelling is the profound psychological injury inflicted upon those whose suffering is documented. The requirement to generate "impact stories" often forces individuals to relive trauma for the camera (User Query), a process that subjects survivors to unnecessary emotional distress without the requisite support structures, fundamentally violating the ethical principle of primum non nocere (first, do no harm). When a person’s voice is selectively edited or removed entirely (User Query), it is an act of erasure that violates their dignity and agency, compounding the initial trauma.12

This systemic trauma also extends to the African professionals responsible for documenting these events. Local journalists are vital sources of public health information, particularly during emergencies like the Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in Sierra Leone.13 These media professionals daily encounter and document horrific societal issues, yet many operate without crucial support systems, including medical insurance, counseling, or mental health resources.14

The consequence is a severe collateral damage on African journalists. Findings indicate that two-thirds of journalists are negatively affected by graphic and disturbing stories, and 80 percent experience burnout due to trauma coverage. Alarmingly, 1 in 10 journalists has reportedly considered suicide.14 The struggle of Sierra Leonean journalists during the EVD outbreak, who shifted roles and struggled with personal fears, highlights this professional and personal burden.13

This analysis suggests that unethical global health storytelling is not just a moral failure against the subject but a critical mental health hazard for the African media professionals who are the frontline documentarians. When African journalists are traumatized, unsupported, and experience high turnover, their capacity to perform rigorous, complex, evidence-driven health reporting is severely hampered.14 This deterioration in local information quality creates a vacuum, which is readily filled by superficial, internationally-driven, deficit-based narratives, perpetuating reliance on external perspectives.

2.2. The Adversary of Stigma: How Reductionist Stories Inhibit Care

The ethical failure of deficit-based storytelling has direct, quantifiable public health consequences, specifically through the propagation of stigma. Stigma is a formidable adversary to health efforts in Africa, leading to the marginalization and discrimination of individuals afflicted by diseases like HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, leprosy, Ebola, Covid-19, and monkeypox.16

Unethical narratives actively compound this discrimination. Vulnerable populations, including key populations and women, often face barriers when seeking care, exacerbated by privacy breaches and differential treatment.16 Stories that reduce these individuals to singular, poverty-driven "victim" identities inadvertently reinforce the societal biases—moral, medical, and social—that perpetuate discrimination.16

This has significant implications for disease control. For instance, even before the COVID-19 pandemic, research consistently indicated that individuals living with HIV were more susceptible to stigma compared to those with other infectious diseases.16 During outbreaks, heightened stigma against specific minority groups or foreigners has hindered healthcare access.16 The failure to communicate ethically, therefore, creates a narrative environment where fear of disclosure leads individuals to hide their status or avoid clinics entirely. Consequently, the narrative failure turns into a clinical consequence, acting as a vector for disease propagation and worsening health outcomes due to delayed surveillance and treatment.

This problem is equally prevalent in mental health. Stigma and discrimination attached to mental health diseases prevent many people from seeking necessary treatment, despite immense societal pressures like economic instability, pandemic-related anxiety, and security challenges.17 While campaigns like #breakingstigma are essential to encourage individuals to prioritize mental well-being, their necessity underscores the deep-seated damage caused by years of silence and negative representation.17 Ethical communication guidelines are thus not merely about reputation management; they are an essential component of epidemic preparedness and response.

III. The Hidden Financial and Entrepreneurial Toll

Unethical storytelling has moved beyond a reputational or moral hazard to become a structural economic problem that limits Africa’s financial sovereignty and stunts domestic innovation. The constant global portrayal of the continent through the lens of crisis, poverty, and victimhood has a quantifiable, multi-billion dollar cost.

3.1. Inflating the Africa Risk Premium: Quantifying the Cost of Perception

Negative media stereotypes are not abstract problems; they are inflating the cost of borrowing for African countries by billions of dollars annually in real economic terms.18 A comprehensive analysis revealed that biased coverage directly impacts investor perceptions, credit ratings, and, ultimately, sovereign bond yields.18

The economic burden on African nations due to negative narratives is estimated to be up to $4.2 billion annually in increased debt servicing costs alone.19 The evidence of this bias is disproportionate: global articles covering elections in countries like Kenya and Nigeria carried a highly negative tone (88% and 69% negative, respectively), far exceeding the negativity observed in countries with similar political and economic risks, such as Malaysia (48% negative).18

This negative sentiment affects investor behavior directly: investors demand higher interest rates when media coverage is persistently negative, thereby increasing debt servicing costs.18 This effect is so pronounced that researchers estimate if a country like Egypt were covered as positively as Thailand—a nation with a similar risk profile—its bond yields could fall by almost one percentage point, saving the country hundreds of millions of dollars each year.18

This narrative failure functions as an indirect tax on African development. The billions lost annually to inflated borrowing costs could otherwise provide critical resources for essential public services. For instance, $4.2 billion could fund the immunization of over 73 million children (more than the combined populations of Angola and Mozambique) or provide clean drinking water to over two-thirds of Nigeria's entire population.19 Instead, these funds are diverted to debt payments, contributing to structural fragility and forcing governments to implement austerity measures that lead to failing public systems, such as insufficient wages for nearly all health workers (97%) and widespread lack of basic materials in schools.20 The narrative cost directly correlates with system-wide vulnerability and increased human suffering.

3.2. Stifling Innovation and Creativity: Undermining Local Health Entrepreneurship

The dominant "Afro-pessimist narrative," which characterizes the continent primarily through poverty and disease, actively suppresses the dynamic reality of the "Africa Rising" movement—a surge of creativity, agency, and pride driven by a new generation of entrepreneurs and activists.21

By constantly highlighting "need" rather than "capacity," the narrative framework distorts the global perception of Africa's market viability. Biased media narratives, particularly during key political moments, inflate perceived risk and actively deter Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in strategic sectors, despite the continent being known for low default rates and high returns.19 This creates a significant market distortion, pushing investment towards temporary aid relief rather than sustainable innovation, manufacturing, and R&D.22 The result is that local enterprises and health entrepreneurs struggle to scale, limiting the growth of self-sufficient health systems and maintaining reliance on imported medical solutions.23

African Women Immigrant Entrepreneurs (AWIE), particularly those involved in health innovation, often face a compounded "Triple Disadvantage" due to their intersecting identities (gender, race, and immigrant status).24 Reductionist, victim-based narratives further compound these structural challenges by obscuring their resilience and successes, thereby limiting access to critical capital and networks needed for growth.

Table 2: Quantifiable Cost of Negative Narratives on African Financial Stability

IV. Towards Ethical Reciprocity and African Narrative Sovereignty

Reclaiming narrative integrity and reversing the quantifiable harm requires systemic shifts in governance, ethics, and media practice, establishing principles of reciprocity and African self-determination.

4.1. Insisting on Reciprocity and Institutional Reform

Africa must lead its own health revolution, founded upon ethical, African-led research and strong political will to fund and scale homegrown Research & Development.25 This vision necessitates the establishment of non-negotiable continental strategies. The development of regional manufacturing hubs, the establishment of the African Medicines Agency, and pooled procurement mechanisms are crucial steps toward self-reliance.22 Critically, health aid must be restructured to support, rather than undermine, continental industrialization strategies.

The relationship between Africa and global partners must be transformed from one of unidirectional extraction to reciprocal exchange. If external actors, such as the United States, require access to African data for their security or research, Africa must demand reciprocal access to foreign technology, early-warning systems, and research outputs.22 Surveillance and research should function as a two-way exchange, fostering a partnership based on shared risk and mutual benefit, which inherently supports narratives of competence and collaboration over deficit and dependence. This shift in power dynamics fundamentally addresses the coloniality often embedded in global health partnerships and funding structures.26

4.2. Adopting and Enforcing African-Centric Ethical Frameworks

Operationalizing African moral theory, specifically Ubuntu, provides the ethical blueprint for communication reform. The theoretical principles can be translated into practical standards through concepts like incompleteness and conviviality.9 Incompleteness requires epistemic humility, forcing external communicators to acknowledge the limits of their understanding and challenge the reductive "expert saving victim" storyline. Conviviality demands a disposition for meaningful exchange and mutual learning, prioritizing the views and experiences of others.9

International and local organizations must adopt and strictly enforce codes of conduct that mandate ethical storytelling, ensuring that all published material provides a "true and accurate reflection" of the work and aligns with principles of respect and partnership.27

The standard for informed consent requires urgent elevation. Consent must be fully transparent, ensuring participants understand the full consequences of the content's long-term global usage, including its application across print, online platforms, and social media.28 The consent process must be clear about project goals and objectives and explicitly acknowledge the complex politics of representation surrounding visual media.29 By mandating standards that reflect the dignity inherent in the communal framework, organizations can minimize psychological re-traumatization and combat the erasure of voices in the resulting narratives.

4.3. Empowering New Narratives: Investing in Rigorous African Journalism

To counteract decades of sensationalism, deliberate, sustained investment in rigorous African-led health journalism is essential. The media landscape requires platforms that move beyond the constraints of short-form clips to deliver "long-form, deeply reported stories" that provide evidence for policymakers and drive institutional accountability.15

African-led initiatives, such as DeFrontera, demonstrate a successful model for this necessary transformation. Their work focuses on systemic investigations, covering complex issues like the collapse of maternal health programs under systemic failures and the efficacy of transformational protocols that dramatically reduce maternal deaths.15 This is the necessary counter-narrative to disaster voyeurism: detailed, evidence-based reporting that documents both systemic challenges and African-led solutions.

Rigorous African-led health journalism provides the essential evidence base for domestic policy reform. This shifts the function of the story from a tool for foreign fundraising to a critical mechanism for domestic accountability and improvement.15 Finally, global health institutions and award bodies must reform their criteria to celebrate achievements that move beyond biomedical reductionism, recognizing African scholars and leaders whose work integrates societal, development, and clinical lenses to address complex issues.26

V. Conclusion: Reclaiming Narrative Sovereignty for Health and Prosperity

Unethical storytelling in global health and development represents a profound systemic failure, resulting in a triple violation: a psychological injury inflicted through re-traumatization and voice erasure; a clinical barrier that exacerbates disease spread by fueling stigma; and a quantifiable economic burden that costs African nations billions annually through an inflated risk premium.

This report establishes that narrative sovereignty is inseparable from technological and economic sovereignty. The persistent focus on deficit and victimhood functions as an indirect tax on African financial stability, diverting $4.2 billion annually away from crucial investments in public health and education systems. Furthermore, this narrative distortion actively limits Foreign Direct Investment in African innovation and entrepreneurship, maintaining reliance on external aid rather than fostering self-sustaining growth.

Achieving true health equity demands fundamental reforms in global communication practices. This requires the international community to reform funding mechanisms to reward dignity, complexity, and agency, moving away from fragmented, crisis-driven appeals. For African institutions, the path forward is non-negotiable: institutionalize ethical frameworks grounded in African moral theories like Ubuntu, insist on reciprocal partnerships in research and data, and invest vigorously in domestic, evidence-driven health journalism. Narrative sovereignty is the non-negotiable prerequisite for sustainable African innovation, creativity, and long-term prosperity.

Works cited

1. Is Poverty Porn a thing of the past? Yes and No, accessed October 14, 2025, https://frompoverty.oxfam.org.uk/is-poverty-porn-a-thing-of-the-past-yes-and-no/
2. The Problem With "Poverty Porn" - Bloomerang, accessed October 14, 2025, https://bloomerang.com/blog/the-problem-with-poverty-porn/
3. Poverty Porn and Africa: Contributing Toward Dangerous Misperceptions. | by Africa Insight, accessed October 14, 2025, https://africainsight.medium.com/poverty-porn-and-africa-contributing-toward-dangerous-misperceptions-d63c629e77cd
4. Fundraising through poverty porn: Ethical concerns | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed October 14, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381142392_Fundraising_through_poverty_porn_Ethical_concerns
5. Why challenging global health funding cuts are an opportunity for reform - Wellcome, accessed October 14, 2025, https://wellcome.org/news/why-challenging-global-health-funding-cuts-are-opportunity-reform
6. The Golden Age of Global Health is Over. What Follows? - PMC, accessed October 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12263531/
7. African and Western Moral Theories in a Bioethical Context | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed October 14, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40448507_African_and_Western_Moral_Theories_in_a_Bioethical_Context
8. African and Western moral theories in a bioethical context - PubMed, accessed October 14, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19961513/
9. Centering Africa as context and driver for Global Health Ethics: incompleteness, conviviality and the limits of Ubuntu - PubMed Central, accessed October 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12504929/
10. The impact of donors' reporting requirements on NGO decision-making and projects in post-disaster housing reconstruction, accessed October 14, 2025, https://www.colorado.edu/lab/gpo/sites/default/files/attached-files/anderson_2014_the_impact_of_donors_reporting_requirements_on_ngo_decision-making.pdf
11. How to Secure Grants for Trauma Recovery Programs for Survivors of Gender-Based Violence - fundsforNGOs, accessed October 14, 2025, https://www2.fundsforngos.org/articles-searching-grants-and-donors/how-to-secure-grants-for-trauma-recovery-programs-for-survivors-of-gender-based-violence/
12. Reimagining Black maternal health narratives: Embracing a Vitality Framework for joy, liberation, and healing - PMC, accessed October 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12273923/
13. Reporting in a health emergency: The roles of Sierra Leonean journalists during the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak - PMC, accessed October 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7241701/
14. Culture of silence: Journalism and mental health problems in Africa | Al Jazeera Media Institute, accessed October 14, 2025, https://institute.aljazeera.net/en/ajr/article/3055
15. Why two Kenyan journalists launched a newsroom to change global health storytelling, accessed October 14, 2025, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/why-two-kenyan-journalists-launched-newsroom-change-global-health-storytelling
16. Stigma and infectious diseases in Africa: examining impact and strategies for reduction - PMC, accessed October 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10718398/
17. #breakingstigma: It's Okay To Not Be Okay, accessed October 14, 2025, https://innovativemedicine.jnj.com/south-africa/newsroom/breakingstigma-its-okay-to-not-be-okay
18. The Cost of Media Stereotypes: How Global Perceptions Inflate ..., accessed October 14, 2025, https://mo.ibrahim.foundation/news/2025/cost-media-stereotypes-global-perceptions-inflate-africas-risk-premium
19. Stereotypical media narratives deprive Africa and FDI community of $4.2 billion annually, new study reveals, accessed October 14, 2025, https://africanmediaagency.com/stereotypical-media-narratives-deprive-africa-and-fdi-community-of-4-2-billion-annually-new-study-reveals/
20. The Human Cost of Public Cuts in Africa | ActionAid International, accessed October 14, 2025, https://actionaid.org/publications/2025/human-cost-public-cuts-africa
21. The African Narrative - FutureLearn, accessed October 14, 2025, https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/africa-to-the-world-analyzing-the-global-appeal-for-african-luxury-fashion/0/steps/237199
22. America First in Global Health: How Africa Should Respond, accessed October 14, 2025, https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/america-first-in-global-health-how-africa-should-respond
23. The Creative Industry — The Future of Africa's New Narrative | MIT Sloan, accessed October 14, 2025, https://mitsloan.mit.edu/centers-initiatives/ksc/creative-industry-future-africas-new-narrative
24. A Critical Event Narrative Analysis of African Women Immigrant Entrepreneurs in the United States: Impacts Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic - The Research Repository @ WVU - West Virginia University, accessed October 14, 2025, https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=13026&context=etd
25. Africa's Health Revolution: Ethics, Innovation, and the Power of R&D - YouTube, accessed October 14, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFEisRlMjZI
26. Caught in the crossfires: the Virchow Prize, its inaugural winner, and the quest to decolonise global health, accessed October 14, 2025, https://gh.bmj.com/content/8/7/e013272
27. TROPICAL HEALTH AND EDUCATION TRUST Code of Conduct – Ethical Story Telling, accessed October 14, 2025, https://www.globalhealthpartnerships.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/THET-Ethical-Story-Telling-Code-of-Conduct.pdf
28. Ethical Storytelling at THET - Global Health Partnerships, accessed October 14, 2025, https://www.globalhealthpartnerships.org/ethical-storytelling-at-thet/
29. A Situated Practice of Ethics for Participatory Visual and Digital Methods in Public Health Research and Practice: A Focus on Digital Storytelling - PubMed Central, accessed October 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4151912/
30. A prize for global health in the name of Rudolf Virchow - PMC, accessed October 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10615153/